Two right-backs in midfield - are Chelsea short despite £349m spent?

Arsenal 2-1 Chelsea: Are Blues short of midfield options despite £349m spent? - BBC Sport

BBC Homepage

Skip to content

Accessibility Help

Your account

Home

News

Sport

Earth

Reel

Worklife

Travel

Culture

Future

Music

TV

Weather

Sounds

More menu

More menu

Search BBC


BBC Sport


Home

Football

Cricket

Formula 1

Rugby U

Tennis

Golf

Cycling

Athletics

More

A-Z Sports

American Football

Athletics

Basketball

Boxing

Cricket

Cycling

Darts

Disability Sport

Football

Formula 1

Gaelic Games

Golf

Gymnastics

Horse Racing

Mixed Martial Arts

Motorsport

Netball

Rugby League

Rugby Union

Snooker

Swimming

Tennis

Full Sports A-Z


More from Sport

England

Scotland

Wales

Northern Ireland

Quizzes

News Feeds

Help & FAQs


Chelsea

Scores & Fixtures

Table

Live Match Updates

Transfers

Who Am I? Quiz

Ask Me Anything

Two right-backs in midfield - are Chelsea short despite £349m spent?

Image source:

Getty Images

Image caption:

Reece James, right, has featured solely as a midfielder for manager Xabi Alonso in competitive matches this season

By

Nizaar Kinsella

Football reporter at Emirates Stadium

Published

13 minutes ago

Chelsea ended Sunday's 2-1 defeat by champions Arsenal with two players who began their careers as right-backs alongside each other in midfield.

After spending £349m during the summer transfer window, how did they reach that point?

It was Reece James, who began his career as a right-back, who failed to track captain Martin Odegaard as he scored Arsenal's winner at Emirates Stadium.

In the build-up to his first defeat as Chelsea manager, Xabi Alonso said he believes James can become one of the best midfielders in the world.

James performed well otherwise and spent almost half of last season playing in midfield. But there are legitimate questions about Chelsea's depth in that area after Malo Gusto replaced midfielder Romeo Lavia in the second half.

It was lax marking that led to Odegaard's winner, while a lack of creativity from the bench left Chelsea short as Arsenal boss Mikel Arteta's substitutes ultimately helped guide the hosts to victory.

"Chelsea don't have European football this season so they're playing less games and can concentrate on the Premier League. But the worry is you're finishing a game against the champions, and you've got two right-backs in midfield," Ashley Young told BBC Sport.

"You look at Lavia, who was injured a lot last season. The front line are going to send fear throughout the league but behind that you see the midfield and they're playing right-backs there. Teams will be seeing the game today, seeing that Chelsea will sit in there and get men behind the ball, but there's still spaces through the lines, and Arsenal found that out."

Why Chelsea look short in midfield

The primary issue is the absence of midfielder Moises Caicedo.

The Ecuador international is out with an unspecified injury for an unknown period after breaking down just 11 minutes into a substitute appearance against Brighton last week.

It has left Alonso in almost uncharted territory for a Chelsea boss. Aside from suspensions, Caicedo had missed only two matches during the previous three seasons, through a knock and illness.

Asked about Caicedo, Alonso said: "Not longer term, but it is about assessing the risk. Probably last week we brought him back too early and I don't want to make the same mistake again."

It remains unclear whether Chelsea had concerns over Caicedo's fitness while pursuing several central midfielders on transfer deadline day.

Monaco pulled the plug on Chelsea's £47m move for Lamine Camara at the last minute, leaving officials at Stamford Bridge furious.

Chelsea also had bids of up to £64m rejected for Bournemouth