Manchester City Charges: How Much Did Their Rule Breaking Cost Your Team? - BBC Sport
BBC Homepage
Skip to content Accessibility Help
Your account
Home News Sport Business Technology Health Culture Arts Travel Earth Audio Video Live
More menu More menu
Search BBC
Home News Sport Business Technology Health Culture Arts Travel Earth Audio Video Live
Close menu
BBC Sport
Menu
Home Football Cricket Formula 1 Rugby U Tennis Golf Cycling Athletics More
A-Z Sports
- American Football
- Athletics
- Basketball
- Boxing
- Cricket
- Cycling
- Darts
- Disability Sport
- Football
- Formula 1
- Gaelic Games
- Golf
- Gymnastics
- Horse Racing
- Mixed Martial Arts
- Motorsport
- Netball
- Rugby League
- Rugby Union
- Snooker
- Swimming
- Tennis
Full Sports A-Z
More from Sport
England Scotland Wales Northern Ireland
Quizzes
News Feeds
Help & FAQs
Football
- Scores & Fixtures
- Tables
- Premier League
- Women's Football
- Teams
- Leagues & Cups
- Gossip
- Top Scorers
- European
- Quizzes
How much did Man City's rule breaking cost your team?
[Video: Figure caption, BBC Sport's Dale Johnson, Dan Roan, Laura Scott and Sami Mokbel assess Manchester City's position]
By Dale Johnson, Football issues correspondent
Published 13 minutes ago
Imagine a world where Manchester City had not used "sham contracts" to build a team capable of winning three Premier League titles, one FA Cup and three EFL Cups.
If City were the winners, then there had to be losers. Not just those teams who finished runners-up or lost cup finals. The potential impact runs much deeper and includes missed Champions League qualification, relegation and Premier League prize money.
Thirty-five other teams played in the English top flight between 2009 and 2018. And every one could in some way claim to have been left financially out of pocket.
City, of course, deny any wrongdoing and they have appealed. But as it stands they are guilty of all charges related to inflating their sponsorship income to the tune of £830m, plus another £90m in expenses.
Strip that money out and it changes the whole complexion of the competition.
BBC Sport has crunched the numbers to assess the potential financial impact on the top flight.
How the figures are worked out
When Sheikh Mansour bought Manchester City in 2008 they were far removed from the club you see today. Since finishing fifth in 1991-92, the last season before the formation of the Premier League, City's highest placing had been eighth in 2004-05.
The Abu Dhabi money poured in via what the Premier League's independent commission described as a "disguised funding scheme". It took the club's sponsorship revenues from being on a par with Stoke City in 2008-09 to eventually overtaking those of Manchester United.
City finished fifth in 2009-10. Since then, not once have they finished outside the top four in the Premier League.
Did this money deny other clubs a place in the competition, and other kinds of success?
This article is not trying to set out how much compensation a team might be able to claim. Nor is it saying any one team would definitely have avoided relegation or reached the Champions League. It is about chance, the possibility that a very different City team would have taken to the field without the hundreds of millions pumped in by the club's Abu Dhabi owners.
It has not considered potential future earnings from success, including sponsors' bonuses and further prize money. Nor has it factored in players who may feel they have missed out on salary increases, or triggered payments, for how their club might have performed.
This is purely about domestic impact:
- Lost prize money by league placing
- Missed potential Champions League earnings
- Europa League payments
- Loss of Premier League status
- Impact of cup final defeats
What Manchester's 'super-profit' deal with City owners has paid out so far
Published 3 hours ago
How City gained £1.17bn, and others may have lost £799.5m