Meta’s $18bn Settlement: A Turning Point for Social Media Child Safety
BBC Homepage
Accessibility Help
Your account
Home
News
Meta’s $18bn Settlement: A Surprising Turn of Events
Meta’s decision to settle the case on Wednesday was unexpected. I had anticipated a prolonged courtroom battle as 29 states, comprising nearly two-thirds of North America, took on a major US tech corporation.
Technically, the trial centered on children’s online privacy, based on the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), a US law over three decades old. It investigated Meta’s collection and use of data from children under 13 over several years.
In reality, it was a collective assault on Meta’s online safety record. Meta, alongside other social media platforms, is under global scrutiny in 2026, with a potential end to ‘doomscrolling’ on the horizon.
Meta to Pay Up to $18bn
The trial, which lasted just five days, concluded before CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified. Whistleblower Arturo Bejar, a former Instagram executive, claimed that despite his warnings about children’s safety, no action was taken.
Another executive testified about not remembering a slide deck suggesting Meta sometimes paid fines instead of making changes to comply with regulations. Internal memos revealed the company knew opt-in tools had low adoption rates but launched safety features that were not enabled by default.
A Realistic Settlement
There were fears Meta could face hundreds of billions in fines, with the worst-case scenario reaching $1.4tn—equal to the company’s entire value. However, a more plausible figure was in the hundreds of billions.
The settlement of up to $18bn, spread over 10 years, is significantly lower, indicating a pragmatic approach to avoid a prolonged legal battle with potentially devastating financial consequences.
