9/11 anniversary: How the lessons of the attacks are still being learnt
British Broadcasting Corporation
Skip to content
Spies, strategies and missed opportunities: How the lessons of 9/11 are still being learnt
34 minutes ago
Share
Save
Add as preferred on Google
Frank Gardner, Security correspondent, BBC
The first duty of a government, countless leaders over the decades have said, is to safeguard its population. On 11 September 2001, the US manifestly failed to do that. The intelligence was there yet tragically, nobody joined up the dots in time.
9/11, as the attacks on the US became known, came to define – along with the response – a generation of foreign, security and intelligence policy for the first two decades of this century.
On 11 September 2001, as al-Qaeda’s suicide pilots flew those hijacked planes into the World Trade Centre, I was just finishing a deployment in our Middle East bureau. As a Palestinian taxi driver drove me through the pine-clad hills west of Jerusalem to Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion airport he suddenly turned up the car’s radio: "Something big has happened in America," he said. He wasn’t exaggerating. 2,977 victims died that day.
The attacks did not come out of nowhere. The CIA had been aware of the al-Qaeda network and its exiled Saudi leader, Osama Bin Laden, for years prior to 2001. It even had a taskforce dedicated to hunting him down.
Nine days after the 11 September attacks, then US President George W Bush declared the "War on Terror".
Getty Images
George W Bush was in a school in Florida when the attacks happened
In the ensuing 25 years there have been numerous intelligence successes as well as failures on both sides of the Atlantic. The successes include plots that have been foiled, suspects who have been arrested, brought to trial, convicted and jailed.
But what of the bigger picture? How has intelligence-gathering, counter-terrorism and strategic planning changed in the 25 years since the worst terrorist attack in US history?
A colossal intelligence failure
No one can question that 9/11 was a colossal intelligence failure, or to be more specific, a failure of imagination in the US intelligence community. At the time both the CIA and the FBI were in possession of information which, if shared properly, could have prevented what happened.
The 9/11 Commission Report that followed blamed "failures of imagination, policy, capabilities and management" on the US government. The CIA and FBI, the report concluded, failed to properly assess intelligence and share information with each other and take sufficient steps to disrupt the plot.
This most basic of lessons has since been largely – although not completely – learnt, and sharing between Western intelligence agencies is infinitely better than it was in 2001. The old rivalries between say, MI5 and Police Counter Terrorism have dissolved, first with regional agreements like PrUM (the Political Resolution of the Use of Information) which enables cross-border data sharing on suspected terrorists.
But how much has changed? And are we any safer as a result?
