What We Should Make of CIA Boss John Ratcliffe’s Secret Trip to Moscow – BBC News
BBC Homepage
Skip to content
Accessibility Help
Your account
Home
News
Sport
Earth
Reel
Worklife
Travel
Culture
Future
Music
TV
Weather
Sounds
More menu
More menu
Search BBC
Home
Climate
World
UK
Business
Tech
Science
Entertainment & Arts
Health
In Pictures
More
BBC Verify
Newsbeat
World
Africa
Asia
Australia
Europe
Latin America
Middle East
US & Canada
What we should make of CIA boss’s secret trip to Moscow
Image source:
Getty Images
Image caption:
Ratcliffe was taken to Moscow in a US military plane
By
Frank Gardner
Security correspondent
Published 35 minutes ago
President Donald Trump said John Ratcliffe’s trip to Russia was a "semi-routine" visit, but there is nothing routine about the CIA chief making a secret, 10,000-mile return dash to Moscow.
Ratcliffe met Russian intelligence officials on Tuesday—notably his opposite number in Russia’s overseas spy agency, Sergei Naryshkin—after arriving unannounced on a US military plane, the Kremlin confirmed.
It’s been nearly five years since his predecessor William Burns made this trip and that was at a similarly tense time, just as Russia was drawing up plans to invade Ukraine. So, this is probably serious.
In the absence of any official US comment on the reason for the mission, it is being widely reported Ratcliffe’s trip was to warn Moscow not to escalate in relation to the stalemate in Ukraine—possibly by taking action against Nato members.
Image source:
Getty Images
Image caption:
Putin has stepped up rhetoric against Nato allies
One US official told Politico that the "meeting was primarily to warn Russia against any escalatory action against the Baltic states."
The UK is also in Russian crosshairs. On Thursday, a foreign ministry spokeswoman said Russia could strike British military targets as retaliation for Ukrainian strikes on Russia using British missiles. And a drone carrying an explosive which was discovered at an airport in the German city of Leipzig was probably Russian, security experts have said.
News of Ratcliffe’s visit follows reports of US intelligence assessments that President Vladimir Putin was planning a limited assault on a Nato ally.
But you don’t need the world’s most powerful electronic eavesdropping organization—the US National Security Agency—to know that Putin is under mounting domestic pressure to "do something" to break the deadlock.
Ukraine’s deep strikes with long-range drones have not only hammered Russia’s energy industry, they have brought the war home to ordinary Russians. Nothing says things are not going to plan more than long queues for petrol and billowing smoke coming from stricken oil refineries. The Kremlin sees these attacks as Nato fighting an indirect war on Russia by using Ukraine as a proxy.
So how will Russia respond? There is a broad spectrum of possibilities here. These include stepping up the ballistic missile attacks on Ukraine that Moscow is already launching, including targeting the centre of Kyiv, knowing that Ukraine is running dangerously low on Patriot interceptors to stop them.
UK drone factories may face attacks from "unknown sources", says former Russian minister
Published 2 days ago
Rosenberg: Shortage of petrol but not patriotism as Russians feel growing impact of war
Published 6 days ago
It could entail expanding the undeclared "hybrid war" that Russia is already suspected of waging against Nato countries, using sophisticated cyber-attacks, drone incursions and using not-so-sophisticated criminals to carry out arson attacks on munitions factories.
But at the even more alarming end of the scale there are other potential scenarios which the Kremlin may be considering, urged on by hardliners. One is to distract attention from its obvious failure to win the war in Ukraine by testing Nato’s resolve through a limited attack on a smaller ally, like Estonia or Latvia.
