Mushroom Murderer’s Trial: Appeal Court Hearing
BBC News Report
BBC Homepage | Skip to content | Accessibility Help
Mushroom murderer trial undermined by ‘catastrophic’ hotel mix-up, appeal court told
By Katy Watson and Simon Atkinson
Australian mushroom murderer Erin Patterson’s conviction has come under scrutiny as her lawyers argue several factors led to an unfair trial.
Patterson, serving a life sentence for killing three relatives in 2023, is appealing her case in the Court of Appeal in Melbourne. She was found guilty of serving toxic mushrooms in a beef Wellington to her family members, resulting in their deaths.
Key Arguments:
-
Hotel Mix-up: Lawyers claim a "catastrophic" error occurred when jurors stayed at the same hotel as prosecutors, a key witness, and journalists during deliberations. They argue this compromised the integrity of the trial and demands the quashing of her convictions.
-
Speculative Evidence: Patterson’s team disputes the use of iNaturalist sightings and mobile phone data as evidence, calling it "speculation" and unfair prejudice.
-
Excluded Evidence: They also highlight evidence crucial to their defense was incorrectly excluded from the trial.
Simultaneously, Victoria’s Director of Public Prosecutions is appealing against Patterson’s sentence, arguing a 33-year parole period is insufficient.
Patterson, 51, attended the hearing via video link from prison, while her estranged husband Simon (who canceled at the last minute) and Heather Wilkinson’s husband Ian were present in court.
